6 Comments

  1. JohnGrant213

    The more this thing drags on and more bits and pieces of evidence are exposed the more interesting it could get. Oh Joey lol I know this isn’t exactly evidence that he has clipped anyone but it sure as hell doesn’t sound good and could def bend the ear of any juror who is potentially exposed to it. This thing is really on the verge of becoming even more of a circus.

  2. Savin Rock AL

    Joey did not use a name of someone he wanted to whack or has whacked so no intent if no names mentioned,..just macho tough guy talk….i was pinched for allegedly threatening to whack my brother in law 30 years ago because I said a name…charges were dropped on me…..But Joey and rooster are tough guys and just talking in general….if that is the best the Feds have then fuggetabout that is not that much….joey still beat this case….im Italian and have been in bars with men and pals and we talk macho stuff…like If I ever wanted to whack someone I would put the body in 55 gallon drum , weld it shut and dump it off jersey coast…Just guys talking and bullshiting…At least Joey admitted NOTHING and NO Names…….

    • JohnGrant213

      Agreed it definitely proves nothing I think the feds pulled it out simply to be able to try and influence potential jurors against him image as a ruthless mobster. Plus it seems like they needed anything to try and keep the case from being separated.

  3. Clinton CeeRay Fussell

    It wouldn’t surprise me if the feds are framing him on this one, considering how bad of a f*****g mess they’ve made out of this case. The FBI have been known to stoop to some pretty low levels to “get their man.” Even if he did say it, who gives a fuck. I promise whoever he’s talking about is someone just like him who chose that life. Just my opinion anyway.

    • JohnGrant213

      We definitely agree on that there is no lengths the feds will stop at to get a high profile guy and make themselves look good and history has def proven it.

  4. puffdaugherty

    The media keeps trying to stoke the fire as well by repeatedly bringing up the point of the Genovese guy trying to be tried separately. That is nothing unique. Its a standard tactic for any defense where a question of conspiracy is at hand. Its generally beneficial to be severed from any codefendants if possible because it lessens the whole conspiracy or group crime concept. Who would want to be associated with other criminals in a case if can be avoided. They play it out like its scandalous but its quite normal for any defense like this. Just more drama and sensationalism.

Leave a Reply